Name:_______________________
Economics 410 Final
Prof. Bryan Caplan
Fall, 2010
Instructions:
� You have 75 minutes to complete this exam.�
� Write all answers directly on the exam.
� You may use any books, notes, or other materials that you wish, but avoid spending too much time on any one question.�
� Partial credit may be awarded on all questions.�
� The maximum possible number of points is 100.
� You should have 4 pages, counting this one.
Part 1: True,
False, and Explain
(10 points each - 2 for
the right answer, and 8 for the explanation)
State whether each of the following six propositions is true
or false.� In 2-3 sentences (and
clearly-labeled diagrams,
when helpful), explain why.
1.� T, F, and
Explain:� There would be no positive or negative externalities in a world
with only one person.
2. Mean income exceeds median income in all countries.
T, F, and Explain:�
If the SIVH and the median voter
model are both true, every democratic country would completely equalize its
citizens� incomes.
3. T, F, and Explain:�
Sears and Funk (�Self-Interest in
Americans� Political Opinions�) find little evidence for self-interested voting
by women or the elderly, but strong evidence for self-interested voting by government
employees.
4. Suppose government officials know more about the cost-effectiveness of their �programs than the public, and the punishment for dishonesty is small (pD<B).
T, F, and Explain: Wittman argues that this will lead to inefficiently small government.
5. �T, F, and Explain:� Caplan
(The Myth of the Rational Voter)
agrees that �disparate turnout� is �a grave social evil.�
6.� After World War II, the United States imposed new constitutions on defeated Germany and Japan.
T, F, and Explain:�
These constitutional changes were more likely to compensate for voter
irrationality than constitutional changes that endogenously arose out of German
and Japanese democracy.
Part 2: Short
Answer
(20 points each)
In 4-6 sentences, answer both of the following questions.
1.� What does Donald
Wittman�s defense of democracy imply about federalism and federal grants?� Should he support one, both, neither, or
what?
2.� �If Caplan were right about democracy, dictatorships would have higher growth and higher quality of life than democracies.� They don�t.�� How would Caplan respond?� Who�s right?