Name:_______________________
Economics 849 Final
Prof. Bryan Caplan
Fall, 2003
Instructions:
� You have 2 hours, 45 minutes to complete this exam.�
� Write all answers directly on the exam.
� You may use any books, notes, or other materials that you wish, but avoid spending too much time on any one question.�
� Partial credit may be awarded on all questions.�
� The maximum possible number of points is 200.
� You should have 7 pages, counting this one, PLUS one page with a regression.
Part 1: True,
False, and Explain
(10 points each - 2
for the right answer, and 8 for the explanation)
State whether each of the following six propositions is true
or false.� In 2-3 sentences (and
clearly-labeled diagrams,
when helpful), explain why.
1.� T, F, and
Explain:� Productively inefficient firms have a weaker incentive to lobby for
monopolies.
2. Optimal tax theory does not take account of individual's
ability to pay.
T, F, and Explain:�
Coincidentally, however, optimal
tax theory advises against taxing "necessities" - on which the poor
spend an especially large fraction of their income.
3. T, F, and Explain:�
In a simple median voter
framework, divergence between mean and median preferences can lead to platform
divergence.
4.� Overall, men and older people score higher on tests of political knowledge.
T, F, and Explain:� As you would expect, Delli Carpini and Keeter find that the male-female knowledge gap is smallest on gender issues, and the age gap is smallest on knowledge of current events.
5.�
T, F, and Explain:�
This finding moderately bolsters
Wittman's case for democratic efficiency.
6.� Caplan argues that at least after adjusting for self-serving and ideological bias, belief gaps between economists and the public should be interpreted as irrationality on the part of the public.
T, F, and Explain:�
One implication is that upwardly mobile people are more rational than
the rest of the population.
Part 2: Short
Essays
(20 points each)
In half a page each, answer all of the following questions.
1.� Largely due to
technological change, women's wages have risen relative to men's since
1900.� Keeping in mind the "market
for marriage," analyze the ultimate incidence of this change for men.
2.� Does rational irrationality provide an extra
argument in favor of federalism?� Why or
why not?
3 "Much of the (limited) evidence in
favor of the SIVH can be reinterpreted as group-interested voting."� Discuss this statement, using an empirical
example from either Peltzman or Sears and Funk.
4.� Members of third parties often accuse Democrats and Republicans of "collusion" against the public.� Discuss TWO forms of evidence believers in collusion would advance to prove their case.� How would Wittman respond to this evidence?
5.� The
SAEE asks respondents if they think that "Too many people are on welfare" is "a major reason the economy
is not doing better than it is, a minor reason, or not a reason at all."
0="Lower";
1="About the same"; 2="Higher"
The next page shows a regression of responses to this question on some respondent
characteristics.� Carefully explain the
ways in which the results are empirically typical of public opinion in general
and beliefs about economics in particular.�
Are there any exceptions to the usual rules?� If so, what are they?� What is your best guess
for why they appear in this regression?
6.� Does Kuran and Sunstein's theory of
availability cascades shed any new light on Zaller's work on the mainstream and
polarization effect?� Explain, using an
example from Zaller.
7.� Use Brennan and Lomasky to undermine my
defense of free-market anarchism.