Prof. Bryan Caplan
bcaplan@gmu.eduhttp://www3.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan
Econ 918
Spring, 1998
HW#2 Answer Key
(for Problem 1)1. Re-solve the simple RE model presented in class, with the following modifications:
a. Determine the impact of a money-targeting rule, so that
.
If mt is constant, then the money supply shocks all disappear. Therefore, using the results from the notes:
and 
b. Determine the impact of an interest-rate targeting rule, so that
.
i. Plug the constant value of i into the Fisher equation.
![]()
ii. Substitute the Fisher equation into the IS equation.
![]()
iii. Then conjecture
. (Note also that:
).
iv. Plug this conjectured solution for money into the LM equation to get an equation for current prices, and take expectations of this equation to solve for the expectations terms.
![]()
![]()
![]()
v. Use all this info to solve for the implied values of
,
, and
.
First, we need to solve for yt. To do so, solve
for pt, getting
. Then note that
, and plug both equations into the AS equation:

Since shocks are transient, the expectation of the (t+1) price level in (t) is the same as the expectation of the price level in (t-1):
. Solving for yt:
.
-----
Moving along: plug the conjecture solutions for pt and Et(pt+1) into (ii):
![]()
Then since ![]()
, ![]()
Collecting terms: ![]()
Now just figure out what the undetermined coefficients need to be so that the interest rate is constant - i.e., does NOT depend on the random shocks. Just put i on one side of the equation by itself, and figure out the implied values of m , P 1, and P 2. By inspection:
;
;
. Thus, the implied money supply rule is:
, and
. Notice that the answer still seems to be incomplete, since we want to substitute out for the m-bar terms. To do this, we merely need to specify the initial money stock m0; then
,
, and
.
In short, to raise the nominal interest rate by 1%, you need to permanently raise the expected rate of money growth by 1%. To actually hit the pegged rate, you have to adjust the rate of money growth on a period-by-period basis. But since shocks are transitory, your expected money supply in any period is independent of past shocks.